In our previous article, we explored military history and the development of land laws in Ottoman Palestine. We discussed how the Ottoman Sultan used the Timar system to pay his military during early campaigns. As the Ottoman Empire expanded and stabilized its borders, the need for the Timar system declined.
In this article, we delve into the evolution of land systems in Ottoman Palestine after the peak of the Timar system. We explore how these changes impacted the region's economy and how they have lasting impacts that contribute to the current conflict in Israel and Palestine. Understanding these historical land systems provides valuable context for contemporary discussions about land rights and territorial disputes in the region, including issues surrounding the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The Timar System: A Military and Economic Strategy
The Timar system, as we've previously discussed, was not just a land grant, but a strategically crucial component of the Ottoman Empire's military structure. Spanning from the 14th to the 17th centuries, the Timar system allowed the Sultan to reward military officials by granting them land. In return, these officials collected taxes and contributed military service to the Empire, a system that significantly shaped the region's history.
Map depicting the Ottoman Empire at its greatest extent in 1683. Attribution: Atilim Gunes Baydin, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
As the Ottoman Empire expanded and borders stabilized, the need for the Timar system gradually diminished. By the late 16th and early 17th centuries, economic and technological changes triggered a seismic shift from the Timar system to a new system of tax farming (Iltizam), which became essential for funding the Ottoman military and administration in the 18th century. Timar holders transitioned from providing military service to paying taxes, marking a significant change in the region's economy.
Tax Farming: A Shift in Land and Revenue
The Iltizam system (tax farming) took hold in the 18th century as the Ottoman government needed new methods to raise funds. Under this system, tax farmers were granted land for a fixed period in exchange for paying the Ottoman treasury a lump sum. They collected taxes from the local population, keeping a portion for themselves.
"A map depicting the territory (shaded in green) of the Druze emir and Ottoman governor and tax farmer, Fakhr al-Din II, at the zenith of his power, circa 1630. The territories represent the district (sanjak) and subdistrict (nahiye) governorships and tax farms (iltizam) held by Fakhr al-Din directly or indirectly through his family members and other proxies, including his aides, sons-in-law, or subordinate allies and kinsmen. The domains are located in the Ottoman provinces of the Levant, namely those of Damascus and Tripoli." Attribution: Al Ameer son, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
This system evolved into the Malikane system, where tax farms became inheritable and were granted for life. This shift marked the rise of local elites (Ayan) who gained substantial political and economic power, challenging the central authority of the Ottoman Empire. These changes in land ownership and control would later influence the development of the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, particularly in areas like the West Bank.
The Malikane System: Life Estates and Land Revenue
The Malikane system, introduced in 1695, was designed to stabilize the Ottoman treasury by allowing individuals to buy the rights to collect taxes for their entire lifetime. While this system brought short-term stability, it also allowed local elites (Ayan) to amass power, further weakening the authority of the Ottoman central government.
This historical picture of the Lippmann Estate was taken around 1887 in Sarona (today a neighborhood in Tel Aviv) of a German templar colony northeast of Jaffa. Attribution: Deror_avi, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.
By the mid-19th century, the Malikane system was increasingly unable to meet the Ottoman Empire's financial needs. This led to a move toward private estates, known as Ciftliks, and the eventual decline of traditional Ottoman feudalism in Palestine. These changes in land ownership patterns would later contribute to the complexities of the Palestine and Israel conflict, including issues related to Israeli settlements and Palestinian land rights.
Ciftliks: Peasant Conditions and Private Land Ownership
By the 17th century, Ciftliks (private estates) became the dominant land system in Ottoman Palestine. Under this system, large landowners—often absentee landlords—controlled large estates, while peasants worked the land under harsh conditions. This system significantly altered the traditional land rights of peasants, making them dependent on the landowners.
Photograph titled: Gibeon, El Jib, Palestine, taken in 1862 by Francis Bedford. Source: Yale Center for British Art, transfer from the Yale University Art Gallery. Attribution: Francis Bedford, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The Ciftlik system had profound effects on the social and economic fabric of Palestine. Christian peasants often faced worse conditions than Muslim peasants under this sytem, contributing to social unrest. The concentration of land into the hands of a few led to the 1858 Land Code, which aimed to regulate land ownership and taxation. These historical land ownership patterns continue to influence the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, particularly in discussions about occupation and land rights in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Economic Decline and the Rise of the 1%
By the late 16th century, the Ottoman Empire began facing economic decline. The closure of key international trade routes by European powers like the Dutch and British led to a sharp decline in revenue. Meanwhile, increasing inflation caused by trade with the Americas and growing military expenditures further strained the Empire's finances. This economic decline forced timar and tax farmers to convert their land holdings into private property, severing their obligations to the state.
Photo of Native weaver at work in 1900 Ramallah, Palestine. Attribution: Keystone View Company, publisher, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
As the Ottoman government lost control over vast areas, local elites (Ayan) began to exert more power, effectively taking control of large territories. This situation mirrored European feudalism, where local rulers collected taxes and retained most of the revenue, sending only nominal amounts to the Ottoman treasury. The increasing power of these local elites contributed to the Empire's economic decline and the eventual shift to a more centralized taxation system under Sultan Mahmud II.
This shift led to widespread landlessness among peasants, further exacerbating social instability. Over time, tax farming became increasingly inefficient, leading to reforms and the eventual change to a more centralized taxation system under Sultan Mahmud II, who sought to reassert central control in the 19th century. This led to a series of land reforms whose impacts are still felt today through the continuous struggles between Palestinians and Israelis.
The End of the Timar System
Sultan Mahmud II sought to curb the influence of the Ayan in the early 19th century through land reforms aimed at modernizing the Ottoman military and the Ottoman State's finances. This included abolishing the Timar system in 1831, marking the end of traditional Ottoman feudalism in Palestine.
Illustration of Sultan Mahmud II. (1785-1839). Attribution: Josef Kriehuber (1800 -1876), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Despite these reforms, the Ottoman Empire continued to experience economic challenges, exacerbated by local revolts against the central authority and famine, which further strained the Empire's finances. As a result, the Ottoman central government could not fully regain control over the entire region. Sultan Mahmud II reasserted central power in the 19th century through a series of land reforms. The fallout from these reforms is still being discussed and argued as grievances between Palestineans and Israelis today, particularly in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The 1858 Land Code
The evolution of landholding systems in Ottoman Palestine culminated in the 1858 Land Code, legislation that formalized land ownership and tax collection. This significant law impacted the distribution of land, further cementing the divide between wealthy landowners and impoverished peasants. In our next article, we will discuss how the Tanzimat reforms and the 1858 Land Code led to Palestinean peasants losing land owned by their families for generations to foreigners who sought to buy land in Ottoman Palestine, including European Zionists. This shift in land ownership is often discussed when it is argued that Palestineans were never displaced from their lands and that Zionists fairly purchased land from landowners when they moved to the Ottoman Empire.
"Rabbi Moses Porush (c.) and Arab Landowner holding deed for a large tract of land that Rabbi Moses Porush and Rabbi Joseph Levi Hagiz purchased from the Arab around 1920". Attribution: Chesdovi, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
Conclusion: The Legacy of Ottoman Land Systems
The evolution of land systems in Ottoman Palestine from the Timar system to tax farming, the Malikane system, and the rise of Ciftliks played a critical role in shaping the Middle East's social, economic, and political landscape. These transitions had significant economic and social implications, including the rise of absentee landlords, the shift from communal to private land ownership, and social unrest. These shifts, combined with the Empire's economic challenges, contributed to the complex historical context that laid the foundation for the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Political maps showing territory in Palestine and Israel from 1918 to 2007.Attribution: איתמראשפר, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.
Understanding the historical land systems of Ottoman Palestine provides valuable context for contemporary discussions about land rights and territorial disputes in the region. These historical patterns continue to influence issues such as Israeli settlements in the West Bank, the status of Jerusalem, and the ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories. The legacy of these land systems has played a significant role in shaping the current dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including the challenges faced by Palestinian refugees and the complexities surrounding a potential two-state solution.
Subscribe for More on the Israel and Palestine Conflict
Want to learn more about the historical factors that shaped the Israel-Palestine conflict? To better understand the historical roots of the Israel-Palestine conflict, subscribe to our series, where we delve into the region's ancient history, Ottoman land reforms, and their modern implications. Stay updated with in-depth articles and expert analysis.
For a deeper dive into the legal and historical context, join our upcoming course, which covers key topics like Ottoman land reforms, taxation systems, and more. This course is a must for anyone seeking a comprehensive understanding of the historical factors that shaped the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Sign up now and never miss an update on this vital historical analysis including disussions on the intifada movements, the ongoing Humanitarian Disaster in the Gaza Strip, and efforts toward peaceful solution.
Contact us at info@bellbeanglobal.com for consultations or public speaking engagements on the Israel-Palestine conflict, including topics such as the role of the United Nations, the policies of leaders like Benjamin Netanyahu, Christianity and the Israel and Palestine conflict and the impact of Zionism on the region.
References:
Solomonovich, Nadav, and Ruth Kark. “Land Privatization in Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Palestine.” Islamic Law and Society 22, no. 3 (2015): 221–52. October 5, 2024. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43997236.
Solomonovich, N., & Kark, R. Land Privatization in Nineteenth-century Ottoman Palestine on JSTOR. Islamic Law and Society, 221. October 9, 2024 https://doi.org/43997236
"The Ottoman Land Laws With Commentary." Ralph GlüCksmann Lawyer Tax Consulting. Accessed October 7, 2024. https://www.ra.smixx.de/media/files/Ottoman-Land-Code-1858-(1927).pdf.
Öke, M. K., Fishman, L. A., PENSLAR, D., KALE, B., & A. Gualtieri, S. M. (1982). The Ottoman Empire, Zionism, and the Question of Palestine (1880-1908). International Journal of Middle East Studies, 14(3), 329-341. https://doi.org/3879641
HAQUE, ZIAUL. “ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF OTTOMAN TIMAR SYSTEM: A Bibliographical Essay.” Islamic Studies 15, no. 2 (1976): 123–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20846989.
"Tanzimat Reforms." Harvard University. Harvard University, Accessed October 4, 2024. https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/faq/tanzimat-reforms.
Solomonovich, Nadav, and Ruth Kark. “Land Privatization in Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Palestine.” Islamic Law and Society 22, no. 3 (2015): 221–52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43997236.
"Timar ." Encyclopedia of the Modern Middle East and North Africa. . Encyclopedia.com. (October 12, 2024). https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/timar
Shaw, S. Jay and Yapp, . Malcolm Edward. "Ottoman Empire." Encyclopedia Britannica, October 5, 2024. https://www.britannica.com/place/Ottoman-Empire.
Kenyon, K. Mary , Fraser, . Peter Marshall , Brice, . William Charles , Albright, . William Foxwell , Khalidi, . Rashid Ismail , Jones, . Arnold Hugh Martin , Khalidi, . Walid Ahmed , Bickerton, . Ian J. , Faris, . Nabih Amin and Bugh, . Glenn Richard. "Palestine." Encyclopedia Britannica, October 27, 2024. https://www.britannica.com/place/Palestine.
Comments